Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nathan Eshmade vs Will Maher Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Eshmade vs Maher analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Eshmade vs Will Maher Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Eshmade 1 - 0 Maher
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eshmade has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Maher has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eshmade, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Maher has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Eshmade has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maher has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Eshmade has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Maher winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Eshmade has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 32/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Maher has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eshmade winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Eshmade winning 2 and Maher winning 0. The last match between Eshmade and Maher was at the Australia F8, 11-10-2016, First, Hard with Nathan Eshmade getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Eshmade and Maher have played a deciding set 0 times, with Eshmade winning 0 times and Maher 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Eshmade winning 0, and Maher 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eshmade has played against opponents with an average rank of while Maher has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eshmade has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maher has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Eshmade has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maher has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
51% (36-35)
Career Total W/L
59% (22-15)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nathan Eshmade | Will Maher |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (35/53) | 57% (30/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (26/35) | 67% (20/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (11/18) | 30% (7/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (26/53) | 30% (16/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Nathan Eshmade
Player
Will Maher
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nathan Eshmade | Will Maher |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nathan Eshmade Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-1 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Nathan Eshmade
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Scott Puodziunas
Player
Nathan Eshmade
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Nathan Eshmade
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Benard Bruno Nkomba
Player
Nathan Eshmade
40%
(
25 of
63)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
14
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasile Antonescu
Player
Nathan Eshmade
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
14
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrei Stefan Apostol
Player
Nathan Eshmade
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
13
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
80%
(
24 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Onken
Player
Nathan Eshmade
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Will Maher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Will Maher
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Will Maher
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Will Maher
Player
Brandon Laubser
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 2-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Will Maher
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Will Maher
Player
Luis Patino
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Grills
Player
Will Maher
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Will Maher
Player
Alexander Crnokrak
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
7
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Eshmade Vs Maher Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
